Topic: Oracle

Oracle and Sun: What it may mean for Open Source Landscape

Sharad Jain, Wednesday, April 22, 2009 @ 9:01 am

photo credit: Potato Benevolence

The recent acquisition of Sun by Oracle, and not IBM, took the community by surprise. Open source Java developers have benefited immensely from Sun's Java and IBM's contribution to Java space. IBM has a generally favorable view from open source community since IBM has few significant open-source contributions including those to Apache software foundation and Eclipse. When I heard about IBM's talk of acquiring Sun, I was certainly bothered by the demise of Sun as a company but nevertheless hoped that whatever happens, Java and MySQL, and the strong community behind it, should stay largely intact. And I felt comfortable with Java landing in IBM's lap considering its largest contribution to Java community by any corporate vendor. Oracle is a strong and focussed company but its contribution to open source world is minimal. As open source developer or company, you are also concerned about the fate of mysql. Like everybody, I am trying to make sense of what this will mean for the open source developers.

Continue reading »

• Digg
• Reddit
• del.icio.us

Comments (1)

Software Development

ILog Aquired by IBM

Dietrich Kappe, Wednesday, January 14, 2009 @ 5:32 pm

I've used the ILog Business Rules products on a number of projects. Reasonable software. Does the job. Not exactly cheap. I'm not sure why they went for the aquisition by IBM -- it was announced back at the end of July, so likely nothing to do with hard economic times.

What does this mean for software developers and system integrators? Back when the aquisition plans were first announced, I joked that we would soon be using WebSphere rules. And wouldn't you know it, the aquisition announcement mentions ILog and WebSphere in the same sentence several times.

Continue reading »

• Digg
• Reddit
• del.icio.us

Comments (1)

Software Development

Microsoft to Jump on Board EC2

Dietrich Kappe, Thursday, October 2, 2008 @ 12:57 pm

Hold on to your hats; Microsoft has just made a radical change in business model. A couple of months ago I wrote about the competitive advantage that firms using Linux and Amazon's EC2 cloud computing had over their competitors.

Server-on-demand providers like Amazon's EC2, Joyent,
and others have reduced the capital necessary to launch scalable,
server intensive businesses. Google has just launched a similar
on-demand service, and companies like RightScale and CohesiveFT are building mature businesses around managing EC2 configurations.

...

Facebook applications are just the most extreme example of business initiatives that can be scaled on demand from $70/month on one EC2 server to $10,000/month on many dozens of servers running web, application and database server clusters and farms. Compare that with the old school of investing in a large data center with a significant fraction of the hardware and bandwidth that you might need if your business is a success. What used to cost $100k in capital can now be done with just a few hundreds of dollars.

...

And it's all possible as long as you are using a unix variant - Linux for the most part - to power your apps. So there is a whole class of companies out there using Linux that can out compete their Windows-using rivals - again, the capital they need to launch is much smaller because of cloud computing. That means Linux will win among the class of young entrepreneurial businesses that are so vital to the US economy.

Continue reading »

• Digg
• Reddit
• del.icio.us

Comments (2)

Software Development