<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aesthetics and Web Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2009/07/aesthetics-and-web-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2009/07/aesthetics-and-web-design/</link>
	<description>Running commentary about agile development, user experience design and Ajax.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:33:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: hanna</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2009/07/aesthetics-and-web-design/comment-page-1/#comment-6898</link>
		<dc:creator>hanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=3160#comment-6898</guid>
		<description>Really the images play a great role towards aesthetic look of the web page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really the images play a great role towards aesthetic look of the web page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyEd</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2009/07/aesthetics-and-web-design/comment-page-1/#comment-6882</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyEd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=3160#comment-6882</guid>
		<description>The 1/20 of a second study is highly dubious, or at least the conclusion they made.  Alas, the meme has been spread far and wide.

What they did was present the web page for 50 milliseconds and then blank the screen.

That left a trace of the image in the visual buffer of the brain and allowed subsequent processing.  The feedback they got from users came way after 50 milliseconds and after significantly more visual processing.

I agree in general with all you say here, but that study is the grossest perversion of scientific results around usability in the last decade.

I wrote more about the fallacy of this conclusion at:
http://surfmind.com/muzings/?p=81</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1/20 of a second study is highly dubious, or at least the conclusion they made.  Alas, the meme has been spread far and wide.</p>
<p>What they did was present the web page for 50 milliseconds and then blank the screen.</p>
<p>That left a trace of the image in the visual buffer of the brain and allowed subsequent processing.  The feedback they got from users came way after 50 milliseconds and after significantly more visual processing.</p>
<p>I agree in general with all you say here, but that study is the grossest perversion of scientific results around usability in the last decade.</p>
<p>I wrote more about the fallacy of this conclusion at:<br />
<a href="http://surfmind.com/muzings/?p=81" rel="nofollow">http://surfmind.com/muzings/?p=81</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.230 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-21 17:57:37 -->
