<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cucumber Rocks &#8211; But it&#8217;s not a replacement for unit tests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2009/06/cucumber-rocks-but-its-not-a-replacement-for-unit-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2009/06/cucumber-rocks-but-its-not-a-replacement-for-unit-tests/</link>
	<description>Running commentary about agile development, user experience design and Ajax.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:33:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ennuyer.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2009-06-15- Today’s Ruby/Rails Reading</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2009/06/cucumber-rocks-but-its-not-a-replacement-for-unit-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-6706</link>
		<dc:creator>Ennuyer.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2009-06-15- Today’s Ruby/Rails Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=2665#comment-6706</guid>
		<description>[...]  Agile Ajax » Cucumber Rocks - But it’s not a replacement for unit tests » Pathfinder Developmen... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Agile Ajax » Cucumber Rocks &#8211; But it’s not a replacement for unit tests » Pathfinder Developmen&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piotr Sarnacki</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2009/06/cucumber-rocks-but-its-not-a-replacement-for-unit-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-6648</link>
		<dc:creator>Piotr Sarnacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=2665#comment-6648</guid>
		<description>Jason: Do you functional test all of the controllers? I often leave code without functional testing while using cucumber if controller isn&#039;t doing anything special (standard CRUD for example). When there&#039;s something that I can&#039;t move to model nor I can&#039;t easily check with cucumber without complicating things I create functional test for this particular action. What do you think about this approach?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason: Do you functional test all of the controllers? I often leave code without functional testing while using cucumber if controller isn&#8217;t doing anything special (standard CRUD for example). When there&#8217;s something that I can&#8217;t move to model nor I can&#8217;t easily check with cucumber without complicating things I create functional test for this particular action. What do you think about this approach?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2009/06/cucumber-rocks-but-its-not-a-replacement-for-unit-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-6646</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=2665#comment-6646</guid>
		<description>This exactly how we work at SonicIQ. I&#039;ve actually found that we generally skip functional tests using this technique as the Cucumber specs catch what we would usually write functional tests for. As you say, unit tests are still a must.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This exactly how we work at SonicIQ. I&#8217;ve actually found that we generally skip functional tests using this technique as the Cucumber specs catch what we would usually write functional tests for. As you say, unit tests are still a must.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.250 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-20 23:34:21 -->
