<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Project Website, Part One: Migrating Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/07/project-website-part-one-migrating-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/07/project-website-part-one-migrating-data/</link>
	<description>Running commentary about agile development, user experience design and Ajax.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/07/project-website-part-one-migrating-data/#comment-2344</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=1014#comment-2344</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I'm pretty schema.rb should be in source control as it should be used to create any new databases instead of running migrations from scratch. This becomes more apparent once you get quite a few migrations.
Regarding Git, I think git-submodule is what you're looking for to maintain vendor/rails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I&#8217;m pretty schema.rb should be in source control as it should be used to create any new databases instead of running migrations from scratch. This becomes more apparent once you get quite a few migrations.<br />
Regarding Git, I think git-submodule is what you&#8217;re looking for to maintain vendor/rails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
