<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pitfalls of Using JQuery with ASP.NET Ajax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/06/pitfalls-of-using-jquery-with-aspnet-ajax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/06/pitfalls-of-using-jquery-with-aspnet-ajax/</link>
	<description>Running commentary about agile development, user experience design and Ajax.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Takuan Daikon</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/06/pitfalls-of-using-jquery-with-aspnet-ajax/#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan Daikon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=950#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>It does have it's pitfalls, but it can be very rewarding when you overcome those.  Using the info gathered on the article you linked to, I was able to eliminate the need for ScriptManager in my application, and the end result looks cleaner, is more consistent with the rest of the client-side code, and results in fewer requests overall.  I'm quite pleased with the result!

That's not to say that the built-in ASP.NET stuff wasn't nice to have, it most certainly was (especially in the early stages), but the more I learn and the more the project evolves, the more I wanted this kind of consistency and control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does have it&#8217;s pitfalls, but it can be very rewarding when you overcome those.  Using the info gathered on the article you linked to, I was able to eliminate the need for ScriptManager in my application, and the end result looks cleaner, is more consistent with the rest of the client-side code, and results in fewer requests overall.  I&#8217;m quite pleased with the result!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say that the built-in ASP.NET stuff wasn&#8217;t nice to have, it most certainly was (especially in the early stages), but the more I learn and the more the project evolves, the more I wanted this kind of consistency and control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
