<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GWT Showcase - BRMS for JBoss Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/06/gwt-showcase-brms-for-jboss-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/06/gwt-showcase-brms-for-jboss-rules/</link>
	<description>Running commentary about agile development, user experience design and Ajax.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dietrich Kappe</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/06/gwt-showcase-brms-for-jboss-rules/#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator>Dietrich Kappe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/06/gwt-showcase-brms-for-jboss-rules/#comment-2142</guid>
		<description>@Paul

Yes, you are right, GWT is a compiler that turns Java (and a subset of the JRE) into JavaScript. You can visit our extensive &lt;a href="http://www.pathf.com/blogs/tag/gwt/" rel="nofollow"&gt;GWT tag section&lt;/a&gt; to find out more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul</p>
<p>Yes, you are right, GWT is a compiler that turns Java (and a subset of the JRE) into JavaScript. You can visit our extensive <a href="http://www.pathf.com/blogs/tag/gwt/" rel="nofollow">GWT tag section</a> to find out more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Browne - FirstPartners Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/06/gwt-showcase-brms-for-jboss-rules/#comment-2129</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Browne - FirstPartners Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/06/gwt-showcase-brms-for-jboss-rules/#comment-2129</guid>
		<description>If you think version 4 is good , version 5 of the BRMS (renamed to Guvnor) is even better - the existing features are more powerful, and you gain scenario based testing to ensure that rules do what you think they should do.

I was sceptical of Google Web Toolkit (GWT) before the JBoss Rules guys picked it up - partly because it is so radically different from other Java-Web Frameworks. But if you try out the BRMS you'll see how powerful it can be (and how well GWT integrates with an SOA type backend).

One small point: GWT does *not* use Java in the browser - it' compiles the Java to HTML and Javascript. I've a little bit more on this (and other alternative frameworks) at the blogpost below:
http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/java-server-faces-jsf/2008/03/13/web2-with-javastruts2-spring-mvc-flex-javafx-and-google-web-toolkit/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think version 4 is good , version 5 of the BRMS (renamed to Guvnor) is even better - the existing features are more powerful, and you gain scenario based testing to ensure that rules do what you think they should do.</p>
<p>I was sceptical of Google Web Toolkit (GWT) before the JBoss Rules guys picked it up - partly because it is so radically different from other Java-Web Frameworks. But if you try out the BRMS you&#8217;ll see how powerful it can be (and how well GWT integrates with an SOA type backend).</p>
<p>One small point: GWT does *not* use Java in the browser - it&#8217; compiles the Java to HTML and Javascript. I&#8217;ve a little bit more on this (and other alternative frameworks) at the blogpost below:<br />
<a href="http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/java-server-faces-jsf/2008/03/13/web2-with-javastruts2-spring-mvc-flex-javafx-and-google-web-toolkit/" rel="nofollow">http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/java-server-faces-jsf/2008/03/13/web2-with-javastruts2-spring-mvc-flex-javafx-and-google-web-toolkit/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
