<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hacking transparent PNG support into IE6 with IE PNG Fix, CSS and jQuery (part 2 of 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/post/</link>
	<description>Running commentary about agile development, user experience design and Ajax.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:33:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/post/comment-page-1/#comment-3615</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=32#comment-3615</guid>
		<description>great article! But honestly, after writing work around&#039;s for IEs for years I&#039;m starting to slack... as long as functionality doesn&#039;t falter I try to avoid writing ie6 only fixes. hopefully it&#039;ll die soon. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article! But honestly, after writing work around&#8217;s for IEs for years I&#8217;m starting to slack&#8230; as long as functionality doesn&#8217;t falter I try to avoid writing ie6 only fixes. hopefully it&#8217;ll die soon. <img src='http://www.pathf.com/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: temiyemi</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/post/comment-page-1/#comment-1813</link>
		<dc:creator>temiyemi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=32#comment-1813</guid>
		<description>i tried this out on a site that had similar problems... it fixed the transparency issue quite as expected... but it also created a new problem: it disabled mapping on one of the images used for links in the site.

have u any solution to that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i tried this out on a site that had similar problems&#8230; it fixed the transparency issue quite as expected&#8230; but it also created a new problem: it disabled mapping on one of the images used for links in the site.</p>
<p>have u any solution to that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Fitzer</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/post/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Fitzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=32#comment-40</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Little by little I&#039;ve started to lose my obsession for keeping modern designs intact in IE 6, but sometimes clients just refuse to relax about it. One trick I&#039;ve used in the past for rounded corners was to serve IE 6 aliased .gifs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Basically, create a rounded cornered .gif and delete any pixel that needs any percentage of transparency. The rounded corners are a little prickly but so is the default text rendering on IE 6 (even ClearType looks pretty squarish). The corners are probably not noticeable to a good percentage of IE 6 users as I&#039;m guessing they are used to a substandard visual experience anyway. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing.</p>
<p>Little by little I&#8217;ve started to lose my obsession for keeping modern designs intact in IE 6, but sometimes clients just refuse to relax about it. One trick I&#8217;ve used in the past for rounded corners was to serve IE 6 aliased .gifs.</p>
<p>Basically, create a rounded cornered .gif and delete any pixel that needs any percentage of transparency. The rounded corners are a little prickly but so is the default text rendering on IE 6 (even ClearType looks pretty squarish). The corners are probably not noticeable to a good percentage of IE 6 users as I&#8217;m guessing they are used to a substandard visual experience anyway. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Howden</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/post/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Howden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=32#comment-39</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Use conditional comments to serve some IE6-specific CSS.  In this IE6 specific CSS, simply send some GIFs down the wire in place of PNGs.  Granted the GIFs won&#039;t look as nice as the PNG solution, but they&#039;ll look better than the unfixed PNGs for IE6 users with scripting disabled.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use conditional comments to serve some IE6-specific CSS.  In this IE6 specific CSS, simply send some GIFs down the wire in place of PNGs.  Granted the GIFs won&#8217;t look as nice as the PNG solution, but they&#8217;ll look better than the unfixed PNGs for IE6 users with scripting disabled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelley</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/post/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=32#comment-38</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My knee tends to jerk whenever I see script creating static web design elements. Have you thought of using SVG, like *in this page (scroll down for comments)? Safari, Firefox, and Opera all see the curved capstones around the comments, while IE doesn&#039;t see the capstones (neither is there space taken up by the capstones in IE). &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I even have the page setup to sample the header graphic to generate the gradient color using server side technology that updates the CSS setting. The point is, though, there&#039;s very little SVG needed for this example, and the effect degrades cleanly for IE, which can&#039;t see any of the SVG. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;*Since you strip out URLs:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://realtech.burningbird.net/design/off-painting/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://realtech.burningbird.net/design/off-painting/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My knee tends to jerk whenever I see script creating static web design elements. Have you thought of using SVG, like *in this page (scroll down for comments)? Safari, Firefox, and Opera all see the curved capstones around the comments, while IE doesn&#8217;t see the capstones (neither is there space taken up by the capstones in IE). </p>
<p>I even have the page setup to sample the header graphic to generate the gradient color using server side technology that updates the CSS setting. The point is, though, there&#8217;s very little SVG needed for this example, and the effect degrades cleanly for IE, which can&#8217;t see any of the SVG. </p>
<p>*Since you strip out URLs:</p>
<p><a href="http://realtech.burningbird.net/design/off-painting/" rel="nofollow">http://realtech.burningbird.net/design/off-painting/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tolga Besiktasli</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/post/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Tolga Besiktasli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=32#comment-37</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this solution. However, what would be your suggestion in case i one has a png background shadow image around the whole site?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1. i got one div holding a top left png shadow -&gt; no problem&lt;br /&gt;
2. i got one div holding a top right png shadow -&gt; problem&lt;br /&gt;
3. i got one div containing two other divs. one for bottom left corner and one for bottom right corner... -&gt; problem&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;would you suggest the same way? taking foreground images and positioning them as needed? or can i hack the positions in the turnbull solution already? (as mentioned in the article..)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thanks in advance&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this solution. However, what would be your suggestion in case i one has a png background shadow image around the whole site?</p>
<p>1. i got one div holding a top left png shadow -> no problem<br />
2. i got one div holding a top right png shadow -> problem<br />
3. i got one div containing two other divs. one for bottom left corner and one for bottom right corner&#8230; -> problem</p>
<p>would you suggest the same way? taking foreground images and positioning them as needed? or can i hack the positions in the turnbull solution already? (as mentioned in the article..)</p>
<p>thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.250 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-19 20:59:44 -->
