<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ajax Testing: Doubling Down with Selenium and JMeter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/ajax-testing-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/ajax-testing-do/</link>
	<description>Running commentary about agile development, user experience design and Ajax.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:33:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/ajax-testing-do/comment-page-1/#comment-8173</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=36#comment-8173</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s Cool!!! I was wondering if this is possible or not. I will try that out now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s Cool!!! I was wondering if this is possible or not. I will try that out now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tor I.</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/ajax-testing-do/comment-page-1/#comment-7921</link>
		<dc:creator>Tor I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=36#comment-7921</guid>
		<description>JMeter can call Ajax that you e.g. record using the proxy and a browser, but it does not run Javascript code itself. So there are some browser side-effects of calls that can be &quot;lost&quot; when running the test afterwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JMeter can call Ajax that you e.g. record using the proxy and a browser, but it does not run Javascript code itself. So there are some browser side-effects of calls that can be &#8220;lost&#8221; when running the test afterwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dietrich Kappe</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/ajax-testing-do/comment-page-1/#comment-3368</link>
		<dc:creator>Dietrich Kappe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=36#comment-3368</guid>
		<description>@smith

Absolutely. JMeter just looks at the HTTP requests recorded against it and replays them. Since an Ajax app makes HTTP requests just like a regular Web app, they are the same from JMeter&#039;s point of view.

There can be some gotcha&#039;s, such as Comet, but if unless your Ajax app is really unusual, you should be good to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@smith</p>
<p>Absolutely. JMeter just looks at the HTTP requests recorded against it and replays them. Since an Ajax app makes HTTP requests just like a regular Web app, they are the same from JMeter&#8217;s point of view.</p>
<p>There can be some gotcha&#8217;s, such as Comet, but if unless your Ajax app is really unusual, you should be good to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smith</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/04/ajax-testing-do/comment-page-1/#comment-3361</link>
		<dc:creator>smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=36#comment-3361</guid>
		<description>Selenium is good for ajax based apps. is Jmeter capable of handling AJAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Selenium is good for ajax based apps. is Jmeter capable of handling AJAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.260 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-16 21:04:52 -->
