Comments on: Radiant CMS: Some tradeoffs, but they’re worth it http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/02/radiant-cms-som/ Running commentary about agile development, user experience design and Ajax. Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:14:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: David Lowenfels http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/02/radiant-cms-som/#comment-2597 David Lowenfels Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:39:14 +0000 http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=75#comment-2597 Radiant is open source... why not contribute a patch? Radiant is open source… why not contribute a patch?

]]> By: Brian Dillard http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/02/radiant-cms-som/#comment-95 Brian Dillard Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:58:34 +0000 http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=75#comment-95 <p>@David: My bad. I picked up the habit of calling sidebars "rails" when I was a developer at Orbitz. This was before Ruby on Rails ever existed. You're not the only one to be confused by this terminology that I've been trying to banish from my vocabulary.</p> @David: My bad. I picked up the habit of calling sidebars “rails” when I was a developer at Orbitz. This was before Ruby on Rails ever existed. You’re not the only one to be confused by this terminology that I’ve been trying to banish from my vocabulary.

]]> By: David P Reese http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2008/02/radiant-cms-som/#comment-94 David P Reese Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:39:53 +0000 http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=75#comment-94 <p>Thanks for that summary -- I was trying to get my head around what Radiant seemed to be missing, but somehow couldn't make it click until I read this post.</p> <p>btw, calling the 'rail' a 'sidebar' would have made it easier for us rails devs to parse -- I see "railModule" as a css class and I get all confused :)</p> Thanks for that summary — I was trying to get my head around what Radiant seemed to be missing, but somehow couldn’t make it click until I read this post.

btw, calling the ‘rail’ a ’sidebar’ would have made it easier for us rails devs to parse — I see “railModule” as a css class and I get all confused :)

]]>