Fifteen years for HTML 5?
A List Apart just published a great summary of the ongoing development of HTML 5. Buried at the bottom is a statement that reveals exactly why most people are paying so little attention to this evolving standard (emphasis mine):
Work on HTML 5 is rapidly progressing, yet it is still expected to continue for several years. Due to the requirement to produce test cases and achieve interoperable implementations, current estimates have work finishing in around ten to fifteen years. During this process, feedback from a wide range of people including, among others, web designers and developers, CMS and authoring tool vendors, and browser vendors is vital to ensure its success. Everyone is not only welcome, but actively encouraged to contribute feedback on HTML 5.
Ten to fifteen years? Is this a typo? A joke? No, this is standards bodies in action. As much as I object to the Flex/Silverlight proprietary-runtime thing on philosophical grounds, from a practical standpoint I can't fault the impulse. Between CSS 3, HTML 5 and ECMAScript 4, the standards process for core web technologies is a slow-moving train wreck. What's the point in getting involved when the standards take years or even decades to be codified, much less implemented by all the big browser makers?
Technorati Tags
Topics: Web Standards
Comments: 3 so far
Leave a comment
About Pathfinder
Follow the Blog
-
Get a monthly update on best practices for delivering successful software.
Subscribe via email
Subscribe via RSS
Categories
Topics
Archives
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Blogroll
Recent
- Elements of Testing Style
- Aesthetics and Web Design
- Asterisk-Java Testing with Groovy
- 3 Misuses of Code Comments
- Fluently NHibernate
- Digging a Hole and Covering it with Leaves — The Software Development Version
- The Importance of User Experience - Do You Understand It in Your Bones?
- Writing Your Own Protocol With NSURLProtocol
- What’s In Your Dock: iPhone edition
- Feature Fatigue

Depressing…
Comment by David, Wednesday, December 5, 2007 @ 6:18 am
Please read the WHATWG FAQ entry on the deadline of HTML 5: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#When_will_HTML_5_be_finished.3F It isn’t really as bad as it looks on first sight. For instance, CSS2 is still being developed after a decade. And HTML5 is bug fixing HTML4 which has been around for a long time too.
Comment by Anne van Kesteren, Wednesday, December 5, 2007 @ 7:40 am
Keep in mind that SVG was defined in 1999 and is still nascent in terms of browser support. After 3-4 years of only promise people started to write it off, but it appears to slowly be gaining traction.
Comment by anonymous, Wednesday, December 5, 2007 @ 8:12 am