<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Requirements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2007/08/we-dont-need-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2007/08/we-dont-need-no/</link>
	<description>Running commentary about agile development, user experience design and Ajax.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2007/08/we-dont-need-no/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2007/08/we-dont-need-no/#comment-801</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;mojojojo: Yes, requirements in the Agile process are much more loose and informal than in, say, a waterfall process. Think of them as "just enough" requirements. And I've been on teams where the iterations are of two-week durations with a *release* being 4 iterations or 2 months. Once the Agile process is adapted to the team (or vice versa), I think the process works very well. You just have to be comfortable with not knowing everything about everything.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Davo: I believe we call that a grad school project. :)&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mojojojo: Yes, requirements in the Agile process are much more loose and informal than in, say, a waterfall process. Think of them as &#8220;just enough&#8221; requirements. And I&#8217;ve been on teams where the iterations are of two-week durations with a *release* being 4 iterations or 2 months. Once the Agile process is adapted to the team (or vice versa), I think the process works very well. You just have to be comfortable with not knowing everything about everything.</p>
<p>Davo: I believe we call that a grad school project. <img src='http://www.pathf.com/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2007/08/we-dont-need-no/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2007/08/we-dont-need-no/#comment-800</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No requirements? A consultants dream! Where do I sign up?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Davo&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No requirements? A consultants dream! Where do I sign up?</p>
<p>Davo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojojojo_</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2007/08/we-dont-need-no/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>mojojojo_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2007/08/we-dont-need-no/#comment-799</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Correct me if I'm wrong, but one of the things I remember about Agile Developement is the fact that  REQUIREMENTS for the project are written, but the difference is that they are more loose and informal AND basically are not that precise (the developement is done in iterations no longer than 3 months and above those 3 months no planning is made, it is argumented by the fact that financial market as well as other factors to consider change and going beyond that time frame may lead to maladjustment with the status quo which changed during that time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but one of the things I remember about Agile Developement is the fact that  REQUIREMENTS for the project are written, but the difference is that they are more loose and informal AND basically are not that precise (the developement is done in iterations no longer than 3 months and above those 3 months no planning is made, it is argumented by the fact that financial market as well as other factors to consider change and going beyond that time frame may lead to maladjustment with the status quo which changed during that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
