<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Javascript, Unit Testing and Code Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2006/10/javascript_unit_1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2006/10/javascript_unit_1/</link>
	<description>Running commentary about agile development, user experience design and Ajax.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2006/10/javascript_unit_1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=417#comment-538</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice analogy on the dental front.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the other problem is that professional JavaScript coding is a relatively new thing. Before this recent surge it was seen as a bit of a twine and sticky-tape language that dealt with a tiny bit of your app.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'd be happy to work on a Firefox solution but as you say what about Opera, IE and Safari then? I don't have the plugin expertise for those platforms.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analogy on the dental front.</p>
<p>I think the other problem is that professional JavaScript coding is a relatively new thing. Before this recent surge it was seen as a bit of a twine and sticky-tape language that dealt with a tiny bit of your app.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy to work on a Firefox solution but as you say what about Opera, IE and Safari then? I don&#8217;t have the plugin expertise for those platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
