<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resolution Past by a Majority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2006/06/resolution_past/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2006/06/resolution_past/</link>
	<description>Running commentary about agile development, user experience design and Ajax.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:33:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2006/06/resolution_past/comment-page-1/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2006/06/resolution_past/#comment-902</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yuck. Not just fixed width, but does not scale when fonts are resized. Yuck.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuck. Not just fixed width, but does not scale when fonts are resized. Yuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodent</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2006/06/resolution_past/comment-page-1/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>rodent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2006/06/resolution_past/#comment-901</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Should&#039;nt we design pages in such a way they can be shown in almost any resolution? Not only in different computers we have different resolutions: sometimes i want to surf in a full-screen window, sometimes i wanna have it at a smaller size. As Jeff says, that is possible with current standards.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should&#8217;nt we design pages in such a way they can be shown in almost any resolution? Not only in different computers we have different resolutions: sometimes i want to surf in a full-screen window, sometimes i wanna have it at a smaller size. As Jeff says, that is possible with current standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2006/06/resolution_past/comment-page-1/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2006/06/resolution_past/#comment-900</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think we can design thoughtfully using current standards to allow for almost any resolution, although I&#039;m not testing for anything lower than 640 x 480.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CSS allows us to express widths as a percentage of the container, which means we can make images and columns of text resize to fit almost any window, large or small. You can see some good examples of this technique at Open Source Web Design (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oswd.org/),&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.oswd.org/),&lt;/a&gt; where you can also download the stylesheets and study them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although there are slight variations in the way browsers interpret this, it passes all validation tests and it works well in all browsers I&#039;ve tested. It looks good, too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe that all web browsers are moving toward full compliance with the W3C specs, and I design with that in mind. The best thing we can do to accomodate everyone is to keep the layout simple and use techniques that are well understood by any modern browser. It&#039;s no mystery that the most stylish sites are elegantly simple and load quickly. I think it&#039;s important for designers to understand that they are delivering content, not just design.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can design thoughtfully using current standards to allow for almost any resolution, although I&#8217;m not testing for anything lower than 640 x 480.</p>
<p>CSS allows us to express widths as a percentage of the container, which means we can make images and columns of text resize to fit almost any window, large or small. You can see some good examples of this technique at Open Source Web Design (<a href="http://www.oswd.org/)," rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.oswd.org/)" rel="nofollow">http://www.oswd.org/)</a>, where you can also download the stylesheets and study them.</p>
<p>Although there are slight variations in the way browsers interpret this, it passes all validation tests and it works well in all browsers I&#8217;ve tested. It looks good, too.</p>
<p>I believe that all web browsers are moving toward full compliance with the W3C specs, and I design with that in mind. The best thing we can do to accomodate everyone is to keep the layout simple and use techniques that are well understood by any modern browser. It&#8217;s no mystery that the most stylish sites are elegantly simple and load quickly. I think it&#8217;s important for designers to understand that they are delivering content, not just design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.230 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-19 18:11:17 -->
